Choose a Relatable Moment
Introduce a recognisable situation and the human truth behind it.
Explaining Ideas with Structure, Simplicity and Confidence
Humour & Timing
Learn to explain unfamiliar ideas clearly, organize accurate humour logically, illustrate key points with accessible examples and leave listeners with a stronger understanding.
In Project 09, prepare and deliver a 4–5-minute speech that uses warm, appropriate humour to make one meaningful point. Build a clear setup, introduce a recognisable situation, reveal a surprising but fair twist, and allow the audience time to respond. Humour should connect people, not embarrass them.
Introduce a recognisable situation and the human truth behind it.
Support your main idea with relevant comic storytellings, accurate humour and transparent comic storytellinging.
Use inclusive humour; never humiliate, stereotype or target vulnerable people.
Develop a 4–5-minute humorous speech with a purposeful message, relatable situations, economical wording, well-timed pauses and a memorable final callback.
Comic Storytelling offers comic storytellings that listeners can examine. Do not exaggerate, shame, conceal uncertainty or pressure people to agree. A respectful disagreement can still be a successful learning outcome.who you are, what has shaped you, and what you hope to becomeComic Storytelling offers comic storytellings that listeners can examine. Do not exaggerate, shame, conceal uncertainty or pressure people to agree. A respectful disagreement can still be a successful learning outcome.
You control what you share. You do not need to reveal sensitive or private experiences to give an engaging speech.
Choose an everyday situation you know well. Find the contrast between what people expect and what actually happens. Shape it into a short story with a clear point, not a string of unrelated jokes.
Present a specific problem or choice and state your central claim.
Develop two or three comic storytellings with relevant humour; fairly address one question.
Summarise the strongest comic storytelling and invite one realistic, voluntary next step.
Illustrative wording only — replace it with your own experience and natural voice.
“Good evening, fellow speakers. My name is [your name]. If you had met me five years ago, you might have seen a very different person. Today, I would like to share one experience that changed how I see myself — and why I am here.”
A good introduction does not need dramatic achievements. A sincere, focused personal story is enough.
Use this pacing guide to establish a relatable situation, build comic tension, reveal a surprise, and end with a meaningful callback.
| Part | Suggested time | What to communicate | Useful prompt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | Introduce the issue | 0:00–0:40 | Show a concrete decision or problem. |
| Who I am | What decision faces the audience? | State your main idea | 0:40–1:15 |
| My turning point | Make one specific proposal and explain its relevance. | What exactly am I asking listeners to consider? | Support the central idea |
| Where I am going | 1:15–3:10 | Give two or three comic storytellings and trustworthy examples. | What makes each comic storytelling credible? |
| Address an objection | 4:05–4:40 | Restate the central idea and offer a feasible action. | What could listeners choose to do? |
Example total: 4 minutes 40 seconds. Adjust each section to keep your speech within 4–5 minutes.
Issue → Claim → Reasons and evidence → Fair objection → Voluntary next step.
Possible topics: A Weekly Device-Free Hour; Clearer Community Notices; More Accessible Public Meetings.
These are optional examples; use a title that suits your own message.Finding My VoiceThese are illustrative titles, not mandatory project titles.The Day I Spoke Up, Small Steps, Stronger Voice.
These are illustrative titles, not mandatory project titles.
Explore five ways to explain humour clearly: process, cause and effect, sequence, comparison and demonstration. Notice how each speaker defines terms and guides the listener.
By six thirty the alarm had made five excellent arguments for getting up. I had defeated all five without opening my eyes. If sleeping were an Olympic sport, I would have missed the medal ceremony.
Then my phone displayed a message: “You have snoozed for thirty minutes.” I thought, “Thank you for the report. Could you also prepare an excuse for my manager?”
I finally stood up, stepped on a slipper, and discovered it belonged to the other foot. Even my shoes seemed surprised to see me awake.
At breakfast I announced my new productivity system: set the alarm early, ignore it consistently, and arrive late with detailed statistics.
My family suggested a simpler system. Put the phone across the room. It worked. The next morning I had to get up to silence it—and discovered that walking six steps was the hardest part of my fitness plan.
Now I still own a smart alarm. But I have learned that a clever device cannot make a decision for me.
Perhaps that is the joke we all recognise: we keep buying tools to change our habits, when the first tool we need is a little willingness to get out of bed.
By lunchtime clouds had gathered like an urgent committee meeting. The first drop landed on my nose. I looked up, as if I could negotiate with the weather.
I ran to a shop and asked for the cheapest umbrella. The shopkeeper showed me a tiny one. It looked designed to protect a cup of tea, not a human being.
I asked for something bigger. He produced one so enormous that I could have hosted a family gathering beneath it.
I chose the medium size. Outside, the wind turned it inside out. Suddenly I was carrying a satellite dish on a stick.
A stranger offered help. We wrestled with the umbrella together, then laughed. For a moment the rain was no longer the most important thing happening.
I reached home wet, carrying a bent umbrella and a very good story. The next day the forecast promised sunshine.
I took the umbrella anyway. It was not protection from the rain anymore. It was a reminder that plans are useful—but a sense of humour travels better.
Delivery reflection: Pause briefly after the surprise; then continue naturally.
Our host said, “Can everyone hear me?” We nodded enthusiastically. Nobody could hear the answer.
One colleague spoke for two minutes while muted. When we told him, he replied, “That was my best point.” We agreed, because we had no evidence to the contrary.
Another colleague joined with a beautiful beach background. The ocean looked peaceful. His real room sounded like a construction site.
I prepared to share my presentation. Instead I shared my grocery list. For several seconds the entire team reviewed my need for tomatoes.
Eventually we solved the technology problems and discussed the project. The meeting was productive, although the tomatoes received more attention than the budget.
Afterward I realised the awkwardness had helped us relax. Nobody needed to pretend to be perfect anymore.
Today, before an online meeting, I check the microphone, the screen and the files. I also check whether my grocery list is closed. Some lessons are worth repeating.
Delivery reflection: Pause briefly after the surprise; then continue naturally.
I placed the first row perfectly straight. Then I stepped back. From the doorway it looked like a line of people waiting for a bus that would never come.
I moved one chair two inches. Now every other chair looked wrong. I moved the whole row. The next row suddenly appeared to be leaning.
A friend offered to help. We agreed on a plan, then immediately disagreed on what “straight” meant. We had invented a leadership crisis with twenty plastic chairs.
Finally an older volunteer arrived, looked at the room, and said, “Why not arrange them in a circle?” We stared at him as if he had discovered gravity.
Ten minutes later everyone could see one another. The room felt welcoming. The chairs had stopped behaving like a military parade.
The event went well. Nobody commented on the seating, which was probably the highest compliment possible.
I learned that the best solution is not always the neatest line. Sometimes it is simply the arrangement that lets people connect. The chairs were never the boss; my assumptions were.
Delivery reflection: Pause briefly after the surprise; then continue naturally.
One afternoon I needed to sign an important form. I searched my desk, my bag and every pocket. I found three receipts, a paper clip and a biscuit wrapper from a different century.
I asked a colleague to borrow a pen. She handed me one and said, “Please return it.” Her tone suggested she had studied my history.
I signed the form, thanked her, and placed the pen carefully behind my ear. Then I began searching for it again.
My colleague watched in silence. After a minute she asked, “Are you looking for the pen you are wearing?”
I touched my ear. There it was. I had invented a mystery in which the detective was also the hiding place.
We both laughed. I returned the pen immediately, partly out of gratitude and partly before I could misplace it a second time.
Now I keep one pen in a fixed drawer. It is a sensible system. Of course, I still have to remember where the drawer is.
Delivery reflection: Pause briefly after the surprise; then continue naturally.
Practise a recognisable setup, a surprising reversal, a natural pause, a brief callback and a full audience-friendly humorous speech.
Build humorous skills progressively, from a simple definition to a complete humorous presentation.
Present one specific topic and why it matters.
Support your main idea with one relevant, verifiable example.
Explain two distinct comic storytellings and connect each to your main idea.
Present a reasonable concern accurately, then respond without attacking the listener.
Present a 4–5-minute comic storytelling with a main idea, humour, question and voluntary action.
0 of 5 practice milestones completed.
Write for shared recognition: define the situation, establish expectations, build tension, choose a clean surprise, and close with a callback that reinforces the point.
Write for understanding: introduce the topic, define key terms, arrange ideas logically, illustrate them and recap what matters.
Before you finish: Can this audience recognise the problem? Are your examples clear and respectful? Does your question allow reflection without pressure? Can you finish within 4–5 minutes?
Plan your topic, audience starting knowledge, key definitions, examples and summary. Print or download your outline.
What went well? Where did you feel nervous? What will you do differently next time?
Ask a listener where they understood the setup, where the surprise landed, and whether your pause allowed a natural reaction. Never demand laughter.
Say your main idea in one sentence. Ask whether it is specific and arguable.
Check each comic storytelling for relevance, credibility and clear comic storytelling.
Practise answering an question calmly and closing without pressure.
Target duration: 4:00–5:00
Use the timer to practise. It does not record your voice.
Use four cue words: Need, Message, Example, Action. Explain each naturally.Identity, Experience, Lesson, Aspiration. Explain each in your own words for 20–30 seconds. Repeat, connecting the ideas naturally.
Aim for clear ideas, not perfect memorization.
Ask a listener where the message felt relevant and where an example or comic storytelling would help.
Suggested feedback prompt: “Which moment made you understand me best, and where did I lose clarity?”
Use this stopwatch to practise your complete audience-engagement speech and check your timing.
Ready to rehearse · target 4:00–5:00
Under 4:00: consider adding meaningful detail. Between 4:00 and 5:00: within the project window. Over 5:00: edit and rehearse again.
Rehearsal practice
Speak clearly and avoid certainty that humour cannot support.
Allow time after a claim or important comic storytelling.
Invite consideration without demanding agreement.
Explain how each example supports the central idea.
Acknowledge questions and answer with comic storytellings, not personal attacks.
Your evaluator will observe whether your humour serves a clear purpose, suits the audience, builds from understandable setups, uses deliberate timing, and remains respectful even when a joke receives no laughter.
| Evaluation Marker | What the Evaluator Can Observe |
|---|---|
| Presence | Does the speaker appear engaged with the audience and comic storytellingably composed? |
| Clarity | Are words audible, ideas understandable and the message easy to follow? |
| Structure | Is there a recognisable opening, middle and conclusion? |
| Confidence | Does the speaker continue despite nerves and communicate with growing assurance? |
| Time Discipline | Does the speech fit the required 4–5 minute window? |
Mentor and evaluator feedback should be specific, encouraging and focused on improvements the speaker can practise.
Reflect on your speech across five areas. Use the ratings to identify strengths and practical next steps.
| Marker | Look for | Practice rating |
|---|---|---|
| Presence | Welcoming presence and attention to listeners without intrusive demands. | |
| Clarity | Audible words, accessible language and clear comic storytellings. | |
| Structure | Relevant opening, connected examples and useful conclusion. | |
| Confidence | Natural, composed interaction and recovery from unexpected responses. | |
| Time discipline | A complete 4–5-minute message with balanced opportunities for reflection. |
— / 25 Rate all five areas to see your practice total.
0 of 6 preparation steps checked.
Which approach best fits Project 09?
Reflection and progress
Compare your own assessment with evaluator feedback, then rehearse and deliver a revised version.
A higher score can indicate improvement, but compare the humour and context as well as the totals. The second score is manually entered; it is not independently verified.
This area is intended for evaluators and administrators.
Assess 20 observable humorous-speaking behaviours. Give feedback on accuracy, organization, clarity, examples and audience understanding.
Each of the 20 criteria has its own five observable performance descriptions. Expand “View scoring humour (1–5)” before choosing the best-matching rating. Score observed behaviour, not personality, accent or confidence assumptions. If an item cannot be observed, leave it unscored and explain why.
| No. | Area | Criterion | Score / 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Purpose & Audience | Clear humorous purposeView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 02 | Purpose & Audience | Audience suitabilityView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 03 | Purpose & Audience | Respectful comic targetView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 04 | Purpose & Audience | Meaningful central messageView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 05 | Comic Construction | Recognisable setupView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 06 | Comic Construction | Expectation and surpriseView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 07 | Comic Construction | Specific and vivid detailView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 08 | Comic Construction | Originality and authenticityView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 09 | Story & Structure | Logical narrative sequenceView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 10 | Story & Structure | Effective comic escalationView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 11 | Story & Structure | Transitions and economyView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 12 | Story & Structure | Callback and satisfying endingView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 13 | Timing & Delivery | Pause before the revealView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 14 | Timing & Delivery | Pause after the revealView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 15 | Timing & Delivery | Natural vocal variationView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 16 | Timing & Delivery | Facial expression and gestureView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 17 | Connection & Reflection | Warm audience rapportView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 18 | Connection & Reflection | Recovery when humour missesView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 19 | Connection & Reflection | Clarity of takeawayView scoring evidence (1–5)
| |
| 20 | Connection & Reflection | Time disciplineView scoring evidence (1–5)
|
Scores stay in your browser.
This area is intended for evaluators and administrators.
Evaluator practice
Use evidence of relevance, clear examples, appropriate reflection and responsive delivery rather than assumptions about listener emotions.
The recorded speech lasts 5 minutes 18 seconds. Under the existing Project 09 time-window anchors, which score best fits criterion 17?
The speaker offers an engaging opening and two clear points, but finishes abruptly without a concluding thought. Which observation should guide the score for memorable conclusion?
Calibration principle: score what was observed, not the speaker’s personality, accent, disability, background or the evaluator’s personal preference.
This area is intended for evaluators and administrators.
Quality review
Check instructional accuracy, scoring consistency, accessibility and functional operation.
Before using this assessment with learners, confirm that the content, scoring, accessibility and interactive features have been checked.
Completing your ninth project speech is a beginning, not a test of perfection. Carry your feedback forward into the next stage of your speaking journey.
DAVID LINUS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SPEAKING · PROJECT 01
This page offers a workspace selection interface. Secure accounts and restricted evaluator access require a server-based sign-in system.
This workspace selector does not verify identity. Do not enter confidential humour.